<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SalesForce.Com&#8217;s New Tagline &#8211; How to Build Benefits, Big Promises and Complex Ideas into Three Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/</link>
	<description>Qualitywriter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:48:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phildunn</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>phildunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>Yes - and the smallest little differences can hose up the whole enchilada. e.g. gmail has one field for name while other platforms have two (first, last). If there&#039;s one area that&#039;s screaming for a &quot;standard&quot; it&#039;s contact fields. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True - not enough time in the day to get into the grids and clean up data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; and the smallest little differences can hose up the whole enchilada. e.g. gmail has one field for name while other platforms have two (first, last). If there&#39;s one area that&#39;s screaming for a &#8220;standard&#8221; it&#39;s contact fields. </p>
<p>True &#8211; not enough time in the day to get into the grids and clean up data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevensreeves</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>stevensreeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>Yep I know all about contacts.  How do they do with your stuff from Twitter, Facebook, Linked In etc?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Far be it from me to support competitors but the truth is this contacts stuff is very difficult, not because of technology, although that&#039;s bad enough.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google and Outlook seem to do OK but Google to Apple Mail and vice versa is just awful.  Guess this is a technology issue with the difference between .csv and vCard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure this doesn&#039;t apply in your case but the main problem actually comes from the way people use their email address book - not as an information resource but a fast way of filling in the address in an email message.  Half of its out of date, most of it&#039;s incomplete and inconsistent through the file. On top of that there&#039;s a bunch of stuff not needed, or wanted in a business application.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That makes proper transfer of relevant and accurate data across to a business app really tough. But it gets much worse when trying to consolidate several people&#039;s address books into a single business database. The problem grows exponentially with every additional address book.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We used to have a very sensible approach, using a .cvs template users could copy/paste to from Excel files.  It only took a few minutes and guaranteed consistent data across the app.  The problem was users didn&#039;t want to spend the time cleaning their own data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Email has just about no concept of context or process, so users can be as sloppy as they like - but that&#039;s not the case with a proper business app where you link data in context, so users don&#039;t have to go looking for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep I know all about contacts.  How do they do with your stuff from Twitter, Facebook, Linked In etc?</p>
<p>Far be it from me to support competitors but the truth is this contacts stuff is very difficult, not because of technology, although that&#39;s bad enough.  </p>
<p>Google and Outlook seem to do OK but Google to Apple Mail and vice versa is just awful.  Guess this is a technology issue with the difference between .csv and vCard.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure this doesn&#39;t apply in your case but the main problem actually comes from the way people use their email address book &#8211; not as an information resource but a fast way of filling in the address in an email message.  Half of its out of date, most of it&#39;s incomplete and inconsistent through the file. On top of that there&#39;s a bunch of stuff not needed, or wanted in a business application.</p>
<p>That makes proper transfer of relevant and accurate data across to a business app really tough. But it gets much worse when trying to consolidate several people&#39;s address books into a single business database. The problem grows exponentially with every additional address book.</p>
<p>We used to have a very sensible approach, using a .cvs template users could copy/paste to from Excel files.  It only took a few minutes and guaranteed consistent data across the app.  The problem was users didn&#39;t want to spend the time cleaning their own data.</p>
<p>Email has just about no concept of context or process, so users can be as sloppy as they like &#8211; but that&#39;s not the case with a proper business app where you link data in context, so users don&#39;t have to go looking for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phildunn</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>phildunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>I love the cloud, too. Just dipped a toe into Evernote today, in fact. They get so much press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the cloud, too. Just dipped a toe into Evernote today, in fact. They get so much press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phildunn</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>phildunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Overly-complex? Too much for the small biz-man?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like the FOB site, tagline and graphics. Good testimonials, too. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My glitch with Salesforce, Batchbook and the like is the conversion from Gmail contacts to their platforms. Mapping correctly is a bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overly-complex? Too much for the small biz-man?</p>
<p>I like the FOB site, tagline and graphics. Good testimonials, too. </p>
<p>My glitch with Salesforce, Batchbook and the like is the conversion from Gmail contacts to their platforms. Mapping correctly is a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Byous</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Byous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>I have to agree, Phil. I signed up with &lt;a href=&quot;http://SalesForce.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SalesForce.com&lt;/a&gt; yesterday, after a 1-week trial. It&#039;s going to save a lot of time. And the cloud concept is sure good with me. All my stuff is out there, mostly in Google. I&#039;m machine- and OS-independent. Freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree, Phil. I signed up with <a href="http://SalesForce.com" rel="nofollow">SalesForce.com</a> yesterday, after a 1-week trial. It&#39;s going to save a lot of time. And the cloud concept is sure good with me. All my stuff is out there, mostly in Google. I&#39;m machine- and OS-independent. Freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevensreeves</title>
		<link>http://www.qualitywriter.com/2010/salesforce-coms-new-tagline-how-to-build-benefits-big-promises-and-complex-ideas-into-three-words/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>stevensreeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualitywriter.com/?p=926#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would be a big fan of the cloud of course, and recognise the leadership &lt;a href=&quot;http://Salesforce.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Salesforce.com&lt;/a&gt; has brought to software of all descriptions, particularly in reducing enterprise software costs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I&#039;d also like to suggest they missed a word in the tag line - it would more appropriately read Success - Not Simple Software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil</p>
<p>I would be a big fan of the cloud of course, and recognise the leadership <a href="http://Salesforce.com" rel="nofollow">Salesforce.com</a> has brought to software of all descriptions, particularly in reducing enterprise software costs.</p>
<p>However, I&#39;d also like to suggest they missed a word in the tag line &#8211; it would more appropriately read Success &#8211; Not Simple Software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
