I’ve been testing some new advertising concepts with Facebook Ads (actually, full-blow marketing campaigns that start with targeted research.. a topic for another post).
Here’s something I noticed that can help you keep down your CPC spend. Don’t include sexy photos if you want to limit clicks to highly targeted audiences.
Seems obvious, I know.
But let me explain my predicament.
My initial ads were for trade show exhibitors. So, I tried to think of some images associated with trade shows, and *bing* a classic idea pops into my head – booth babes.
So I searched for some uncopyrighted photos and picked a few. None of them were risqué or beyond the pale.. but there may have been some plaid skirts and temptress looking poses.
I found that the click throughs were unusually high when I included them. I’m talking 250% higher when the same ad ran with a diagram of a trade show booth. (Hey, that’s a lot of unqualified click-$, I thought.)
Something about the common Inter-web practice of clicking on hot ladies was the downfall of the campaign, I suppose. For the record: there was no larger picture of the ladies on my landing page (I probably disappointed a lot of clickers).
I’m guessing that cleaner, more qualified leads clicked on the more “dull” ads.
What’s your experience? Do you have any metrics to support the idea that sexy images coupled with value ads are useful? Not useful? Is there a fine line to walk? Best practices?

