I just got an email from Salesforce.com for a seminar/webinar even and was delighted by the tagline that was burried beneath the graphics on the page. It was actually an image tag that doesn’t even show on the graphical version of the email. It says, “Salesforce.com – Success. Not Software.”

I’ve been writing taglines for companies lately, so I know how difficult it is to come up with good ones (especially good ones that big, “too many cooks” corporate marketing teams can agree on).

I’ll repeat it again. Salesforce.com – Success. Not Software. So pure, yet so complex. Heck, I don’t even know it it’s new. It just jumped out at me this morning.

If you don’t know what Salesforce does, here’s a quick run-down. They offer sales pipeline and CRM/contact management software in the “cloud.” What does that mean? Basically, you don’t have to buy boxed software and install it on client machines as a stand-alone program like Microsoft Office or ACT! You log in to your Web account and have a ton of software functionality available due to the latest Web software/services technologies like AJAX, Javascript, .NET, Silverlight and so forth.

So Salesforce does still sell software, but they’ve made it much easier. You log in to the site and do everything in the cloud, so back-up, losing contacts and maintenance/management tasks are effectively outsourced. You don’t have any software on client machines to mess with, which means no IT staff, no helpdesk calls, no hassles.

The tagline captures the benefits of CRM and sales/prospect/customer management — essentially “success.” That’s the bottom line for sales people. You need software to stay out of the way so you can continue to develop relationships with people and solve their problems. “Not software” captures the cloud computing angle and this desire to have things work without hassles.

So simple. So elegant. So all-encompasing. I love it. Good job to whoever Salesforce’s ad agency is.

I’m going to start this post with a confession: I’ve been spending a lot of my non-work time with social media tools, platforms and networking sites. I caught a bug, so to speak. My latest obsession revolves around the ultimate tools for posting content, sharing ideas, sharing articles, and putting up personal photos and videos in the simplest, quickest way possible. I posted my findings about Posterous, FriendFeed, ShareIn and Soup.io in another article that’s linked here. This is ironic, by the way, because one of my recent posts is titled: Beware the Social Media Rathole and Re-Focus on 5 Key Business Disciplines

The point of this little riff, however, is to parse through some of the observations I’ve come across and to make some sense of it all in both a business and personal context. This exercise was originally just for me, but it occurred to me that you might benefit, as well.

One thing’s for sure – there’s *a lot* of chatter, anxiety and buzz out there with respect to everything social media/networking.

First, I want to set a baseline about communication and socialization and what it means to me. Then maybe we can move on to some of the curious things I’ve seen out in the “social networking” world.

I’ll start with an anecdote. When I was in high school, a friend and I started our own t-shirt company. I almost said “apparel company” there, but it wasn’t .. just one idea for a funny t-shirt (see image). The design was funny, interesting and relevant to the obsessions of our target audience – high school kids.

Could this have gone viral back in 1985?

It was about partying, status symbols (tongue and cheek to some extent – heck we were all growing up in one of the cheesiest, money-hungry cities in the U.S.), and college, the fortunate obsession of my peer group. So those elements were all in place.

And we sold thousands of t-shirts, sweatshirts and tank tops. Enough to keep me on the beach and sipping (moderation – ;^)) Coors Light well into my college years.

But I don’t think it was the design, the humor or the general theme that made the project work. Those elements had to be in place, of course. Yet, it needed something else.

We used to call the really popular, socially active kids “soc’s” back in the day (pronounced soshes, with the ‘o’ sounding like its name). I guess I was one of those. But I had hooks into a lot of different groups – including the geeks (I had an Apple II+ before anyone else), the mods (I loved the Jam, The Clash and Generation X), and the jocks (I played tennis but hung out with the water polo guys).

The t-shirt company needed that “soc” component. The word needed to be spread amongst a group of people who liked each other, shared the same values and perhaps wanted to see our project succeed. My buddy and I were in a good position for that. We liked a lot of people, and they liked us. In today’s online world, you might call it “friending” or “following.”

That little business was a mix of social and business.

“Business Life” bleeds into “Social Life”

Over the years (I’m 41 now), I’ve seen a swinging tide of communication and interaction with my own business that straddles this line between social and business. And I always come back to the same core idea: Business is social. That’s no revelation, I know. But it’s important. In my writing business, I work with people I know and like. I’ve met some of them in person. Some through email originally. Some via social media channels. I talk with them from week to week on the phone. We have common goals and interests when it comes to marketing copy, persuasion and content production.

My clients and I got to know each other in person, online and over the telephone wires (the last two are the same I guess). We sussed each other out, made sure our shoes were clean, made sure we didn’t smell bad and decided to do business with each other. That’s the way it works. You can’t take the social component out of it. And personal life bleeds into business life. They can see my Facebook stuff, if they like. But I run a clean show for the most part. I have a few wild friends that post off-color remarks on my pages from time to time, and I’ll put up a questionable humor link from time to time. But everything’s PG to PG-13 for the most part.

So, when I talk to people about Facebook, Twitter and the like, I often come back to the idea that business is social and the Internet is just another communication device. It’s no different than the pony express, the written letter, the telegraph, the steam boat or the telephone.

“But you lie, Phil!”

Yes I do. Somewhat. There’s a big difference between these new tools and the old, one-to-one communication channels like telephone, letter, email and personal conversation.

With those older “technologies,” the viral or word of mouth element is limited. If you call three friends and tell them some gossip or some useful business information, then your potential “megaphone” factor might extend the message out to another 40-80 people maximum, depending upon on the value or interest-level of the message and your own circle of friends. The people on the other end of the line have to be very motivated to call another person and extend your message, so 40 to 80 might be stretching it. The same thing applies to a letter, a newspaper clipping you mail, or an email (though emails are slightly more viral due to forwarding).

With something like a Facebook or Twitter post, however, your information can be immediately launched to massive networks within seconds. All it takes is one friend with several hundred Facebook contacts  or a Twitter follower who has several thousands of followers in their network.

If I had a Twitter account back in 1984, I would have designed college sweatshirts for every community in Southern California and beyond, and then mined Twitter in reverse to spread the word. What does that mean? – “Mine Twitter in reverse..?” This subject is worth another post, but essentially, it’s about using tools like search.twitter.com to connect with people that have similar interests (and to target demographics). You can do similar mining on Facebook now, too. I might have even used AdWords to get the word out.

Who will go to bat for you?

Getting the word out is crucial, of course. And, to go viral you need strong connections to living breathing people. Here are the three keys to getting the word out:

1. The strength of your connections
2. The level of your engagement
3. The quality of your message

These also apply to your personal communications. The point here, however, is that it doesn’t matter what communication channel you use. Use your phone, a postage stamp, an email, Twitter or Facebook. But pay attention to those three keys. These are what will determine who will go to bat for you.

#1 has to do with who cares about you and your products/solutions. The root of this “caring” lies, interestingly, in the quality of care you direct toward your customers and contacts. If you care about your consumers/users/audience, then you’re putting yourself in their shoes every day, trying to figure out ways you can benefit them.

#2 has to do with the quality and quantity of your interactions. How many “touches” do you have with customers and friends/followers? Are you bugging people or offering them real value and insights? Are you answering their questions and trying to help them when your solution is not working out as planned?

#3 is an extension of #2. If you’re selling *anything* these days, you’re in the content production business. Ask any exec in upper management at Starbucks, and they’ll tell you that they’re in the content production and experience business. They nailed down coffee production, franchise and supply chain issues long ago. Their key differentiator is now “experience enhancement.” That means testing store designs and content (e.g. music selections and messaging on displays), engaging with “hub” or power/influencer users online and in the physical world at events, and constantly pumping out relevant information (whether it’s regarding philanthropy projects, music, books or coffee facts). Content has always been king, and you need to produce it well in order to make any kind of impact in this world. That goes for software companies, shipping companies, French fry peddlers, freelancers, web designers, lawyers, dog walkers… everybody.

Now, that said… ask yourself, “Would I rather make 500 phone calls? Or is it worthwhile building a network of Facebook and Twitter followers?” If I were selling sweatshirts, I’d opt for the latter. Multimedia advantages aside (e.g. demos, jpegs, and video showcasing the products), social media tools scale much more easily than phone calls, post cards or index cards on the bulletin board at the local coffee shop.

A strange world in transition

Ideally, social media allows you to make more connections with people and perhaps even make more meaningful, lasting connections – whether it’s for business or social purposes. But that’s not always the case is it? People resist participation, some only broadcast their views and others just don’t communicate all that well.

What follows are stories about three friends/associates of mine and how they perceive social media. Keep in mind, these people are like most of us (with the exception of the techie guy who’s deeply immersed in this social media scene). They want to find tools that are easy for them to use and don’t complicate their lives further. I can identify with that, and I’m not going take issue with them on a technology level. Many of the tools and “solutions” out there that are supposed to make communication easier are difficult to manage, and they don’t do what people want them to do (see my other post on Posterous, FriendFeed, Soup.io and ShareIn).

So, I’ll start with the simplest of stories. This guy is a friend of mine from high school. He’s what I’d call a Facebook power user. He’s constantly updating his status, posting photos and linking to articles of interest. One time I posted a story about Twitter on my Facebook feed, and he fired back, “I hate Twitter.”

To me that was strange. Here’s a guy that spends a good portion of his day using a communication tool (Facebook) to update his pool of friends and communicate with them. There’s another tool out there that does something similar and he hates it. There could be something else going on, too. Suw Charman-Anderson has an interesting post about social media polarization, bigotry and “outgroup” phenomena.

People become religious about their tools and forget the underlying reality – it’s about communication. You see this with people who are passionate about Macs over PCs. Those who like blackberries over iPhones, etc. I’d agree that some tools are easier to use for particular types of people. For example, I like my Blackberry, because I can’t stand texting on touch screens. I think the same thing applies to my friend and his Facebook account. He’s committed to it. He’s all dialed in. And he’s used to the way it works. I can appreciate that.

I’m pretty sure that similar feelings accompanied the evolution of other technologies, as well. I have an aunt, for example, that can’t stand email. She prefers the pen, the ink and a stamp. People despise Amazon Kindles because they like the feel of paper pages. There was a time when a lot of people despised cell phones (many still do for a variety of reasons).

You don’t find many people who despise communication, however. And that’s really what we’re talking about. There are a lot of preferences out there. Some people prefer texting. Some Skype. Some IM. There’s an evolution of how a particular communication thread goes, too. For example, I like to text to set up plans and get simple questions answered, but I’ll go to voice when the conversation looks like it’s going to include more details or a personal tone/touch.

And, if I want to share something with a large group of people without “bugging” them, I choose social media tools like Facebook and Twitter. The people on the other end of the communication can deal with the information (or not) whenever they choose. The scalability factor is nice, and it’s easier for me to update a lot of people at once. This is different than direct communications like @-replies and one-to-one threads in Facebook, of course.

The second friend is a business woman who’s involved in media production and advertising for small businesses. She runs an “old school” magazine/dining guide that recommends restaurants in the local area. I call it old school because the publication is beholden to its advertisers – the old model for print publications. You sell ads and offer the buyers a carrot. If they buy ads, they get editorial. It makes for a very un-transparent, deceptive “guide.” We met up to discuss our respective marketing capabilities, and I mentioned social media, Twitter mining, Word Press blogs, etc. She said she was able to do any of those types of things for clients (with partner companies), but she doesn’t follow the technology trends and the new advertising models. She didn’t know what AdWords are, for example.

During our conversation, she pushed back really hard against any mention of social media or the value of social networking with respect to marketing. Personally, she felt that any new tools or practices (like using Twitter or Facebook) would just complicate her life. She found chasing email frustrating enough as is.

Her demographic for the dining guide is young adults, probably 18 to 35 – pre-children professionals that have time to go out and eat well, club, etc. I mentioned that this group increasingly avoids email in favor of social media communication. I repeated the popular line of Gen Y – “If I want to get a hold of an old person, I’ll use email.” Otherwise, they’re filtering their communications via social media tools and sites. This helps them avoid burdensome activities like chasing email all day. My friend wasn’t buying it. She was more interested in talking about four-color layouts for direct response post cards. I don’t have anything against those, but I thought we’d get beyond that.

And, I must say (Ed Grimley) that I concur with her about the frustration with yet another social media tool to use or site to join. For most of us, it’s exhausting keeping up with these things. People need easy-to-use, intuitive tools that offer shortcuts. Many don’t know about bit.ly and tiny.url and the like. They don’t have the Firefox plug-ins like UrlBarExt. They don’t want to cut and paste links. I think this is why the buzz around tools like Tumblr, Soup.io, FriendFeed, Posterous and ShareIn is so busy. These tools have their flaws, but they’re getting closer to an ideal social media sharing solution (for businesses and personal users). So, I’m hopelessly committed to this evolution. I can’t wait to check out Google Wave, for example. I’ve tried Mozilla’s Flock, and I use both TweetDeck and Seesmic Desktop.

But I was taken aback by this friend’s position. While I could understand it completely, I just think it’s a bit naïve for a marketing professional to resist this. It’s like resisting using the phone for cold calling, using the yellow pages for prospecting or using the mail for advertising in days gone by.

My third friend is a big anomaly… a paradox of sorts. He’s someone I’ve partnered with in the past (on AdWords campaigns for joint clients). He’s a power user of Twitter, Facebook and all things social media. In fact, he frequently offers seminars and talks on the subject. His niche is in helping small businesses with Web marketing and positioning. He’s a big proponent of WordPress (I am, too).

I recently emailed him with questions about some social media issues I was wondering about. No reply. So I pinged him with an @ on Twitter and a DM. No reply. I emailed some more as additional ideas came up. Nothing. Then I commented on some of his Facebook entries to see if I could get a response there. Nope, nada.

It was very strange. Here’s someone who’s hook-line-and-sinker in the tank for social media, and he’s ignoring direct communications. Could be that I offended him. Maybe I owe him money (don’t think so). It’s possible that he’s a huge power user of these tools and that my pings have fallen through the cracks. I could imagine a scenario where my emails go to his spam folder, his Twitter @ feed is way too jammed and he ignores DMs (like a lot of Twitter folks do, due to spam).

It’s just weird that all this use of social media actually prevents communication. In this case, it’s probably time to just pick up the phone.

Circling Back – Be a Communicator, a Content Producer and a Content Filter

Ok, so what are the big take-aways here?  Communication is the critical component to all of this. Despite my failures with friend #3, and the resistance of many to new communication channels – socializing and sharing ideas with people drives business and friendships. There’s nothing new there, but it’s an age old truth.

Also, people are at wildly different stages of adoption when it comes to communication tools. Heck, even folks in the marketing space still resist new modes of communication. People find tools that they like, and they stick with them because they’re comfortable and they’ve invested in some “build-out” of profiles, skill sets, etc.

So what should you do when it comes to using social media tools for better business and relationships? My recommendations are simple (even though I’m often guilty of not following them very competently).

1. Communicate clearly and often – Write better, produce better videos and blogs, and make those “touches” no matter what communication channel you’re using.
2. Filter content for your friends and followers – Use your authority, expertise and experience to help others make better decisions in their lives. Simple. The amount of information available is staggering today. People need trusted filters to make better decisions about the media they consume, the products they buy, and the people they associate with. With the right networks and associations, we’re moving toward more efficient, productive relationships. The tools are getting better, and people are catching on.
3. Focus on value – What do your clients, friends and associates want from you? When you figure it out, deliver that in big, heaping helpings. Don’t spam or bother. Instead, converse, comment and connect. Broadcast messages are becoming less attractive as these new media channels evolve. Interaction and caring are the keys.

Long post. Thanks for hanging with me! .. Fingers cramping… Must get coffee.

I just ran across another advertising campaign that’s mimicking the Lance Armstrong “LiveStrong” campaign. It’s “Army Strong.” Just saw it on ESPN. Just like “Fan Strong” for the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. I’m sure there are others.

Am I just being crabby or is that weak? (Or is using the word crabby weak?). This tagline/marketing piggybacking reminds me of the “Got Milk?” campaign parroted endlessly for more than a decade. Got Sand? Got Surf? Got Weed? Got Faith? Got River? Got Soccer? Got Brains?… Barf.

Does anyone have an original thought? Or is there some science behind this cowardly mimicking?

Please comment if this annoys you as it does me.

“If it doesn’t sell, it isn’t creative.” – David Ogilvy

I just read an interesting post on ad agency focus in the Web 2.0 world by DJ Francis of Online Marketer Blog. The article elaborates on what David Ogilvy said about creativity so many years ago. Year after year, I come back to this philosophical kernel: sales is where the rubber meets the road. We often get so distracted with the fun, new-fangled Facebook, Twitter and Friend Feed tools. Yet, marketing and advertising are ultimately about sales. So, yes, those tools are useful channels for communication. But, if they aren’t used with sales in mind, their ROI is difficult to measure.

With respect to agencies, Web 2.0, social media, etc. will make a lot of dough for many agencies. People love the new communication channels and fun Web-based software tools. For many, however, this will be a money pit, a dazzling show and wheel spinning exercise. If not taken seriously, these types of efforts will get many agencies fired. No measurable ROI and they’ll be shown the door.

Web 2.0 marketing exercises can be a major distraction. Businesses need to realize that these tools and “strategies” are merely communication channels. That’s it! Nothing else has changed. If you’re not delivering the goods through those channels, you’re not going to move the sales needle. And by “goods” I mean the following:

• Prospecting and lead-gen. Do your social media efforts produce fruitful leads? Or have you deluded yourself into thinking that you’re “building a brand” by socializing. Heck, even Coke has to sell soda.. eventually.
• Persuasion. Remember the line from Glenn Gary Glenn Ross – “A-I-D-A. Attention, Interest, Decision, Action. Attention– Do I have you attention? Interest– Are you interested? I know you are, because it’s shit or walk. You close or you hit the bricks. Decision– Have you made your decision for Christ? And Action.” Persuasion takes many forms… but I just love that line from the movie. Dr. Robert Cialdini is the guy to read if you’re really interested in persuasion research and reality.
• Closing. You have to make promises, and provide compelling calls to action and offers. Like Vince Vaughan’s character says in “Wedding Crashers” – “Now get out there and close some ass.”
• Deliver value. Pure and simple – the product has to be a winner.
• Customer service. Every good solution, product or service has to be supported by supreme customer service. Make sure the right processes and people are in place.

Remember, “business” still has to happen. Don’t get distracted by socializing for socializing’s sake. Yes, business is a social activity, but value has to be added and profit has to be made.

I was having a glass of wine with a friend last night – a Malbec, which by the way, was sheepy, barn-yardy and yucky.. some Malbecs just baffle me (I don’t dig it, so I opened a different bottle) – and he said something interesting.

He said, “To be honest, Phil, I don’t think anyone cares what the buildings are like. There’s no connection between the maintenance crews and the customer desire.”

This was part of a long conversation about a timeshare development that’s teetering on the brink of disaster. So I couldn’t resist and said, “Are you going to let me know when you switch back to dishonesty?”

I love this little joke and try to fit it in every once in a while, even though it’s really annoying. I wrote it about a long time ago (Eliminate Honesty from Your Copy), and it’s covered in-depth in my eBay Marketing book, which is now available on the Kindle.

The main point is this. When you’re speaking or writing – especially if you’re involved with a persuasive presentation or document – it’s best to stay away from words like “frankly,” “honestly,” and “to tell you the truth.” Consciously or subconsciously people are going to notice and wonder why honesty all of a sudden became an issue.

Instead, use facts, logic and proof to construct your pitches and explanations. You don’t need to qualify your virtue when clear, compelling information is at hand.

That other stuff sounds “salesy” and a bit cheap. You’re better than that.

And, yes, please use my joke when you’re out with friends. It’s a real show stopper.. but it might just get you a face full of Malbec, so be careful.

Are you stuck on a sentence right now?

Can’t find the right word?

Having doubts about a particular approach?

Having trouble starting a writing project? (large or small)

Stop what you’re doing. Don’t get distracted or procrastinate. Send me a quick email with the copy in question. I’ll send you some options, ideas and a high quality alternative to your existing sentence.

I’m thinking about writing and communication methods all the time.

For the past 15 years, I’ve spent every day helping companies write quality content for the web, direct response campaigns, and in print (articles, white papers, case studies, trade show scripts, special reports, data sheets, brochures… you name it).

Send me your sentence right now. If I can improve it, I’ll fix it (I’ll also tell you what’s working and what you’ve done right).  No strings attached. No charge. It’s just my little way to offer help and show companies how I work.

dunn@qualitywriter.com

.. Unless You Find a Way to Make Them Profit Your Customers

One of the hottest, latest conversation starters in marketing and sales meetings across the planet is “social media.” Ask people to join you in a meeting about social media, and you’ll find a lot of takers. This goes for internal folks and customers/prospects alike. The hype has hit that critical mass level.

But you’ll soon find out that most people don’t know what the heck they’re talking about or what the heck they want to accomplish with social media.

Everyone loves it, of course.

“I’m on Facebook!”

“Follow me on Twitter.”

“Join me on LinkedIn.”

Yet a lot of marketing and sales folks who are pumped about what this all means can’t give you a detailed outline of their social media and social networking strategies.

And by strategies I mean the following: How can I leverage social media platforms to make a difference in the lives of my customers or prospects?

Ask yourself some questions to get to the root of this strategy dilemma:

• How do people use these tools/applications?
• Why are they using them?
• What exactly can I do with things like Twitter and Facebook to start conversations with customers?
• What kinds of conversations do I want to have?
• What’s my goal when I have a conversation with someone via social media?
• Should I have a goal?
• Should I be educating?
• Should I give out free information?
• How do I structure free information to draw people closer to my organization and solutions?
• Can I schedule meetings, webinars or phone calls via social media?
• Can I close business on these platforms?
• What’s possible?

The ultimate goal of an exercise like this should drive to one general area, and that is: How does the person on the other end of these transactions and communications stand to profit from the exchange?

Are you solving a problem for them? Can you help them make more money for themselves and their company? Can you help them get a job or a promotion? Can you help them keep a job that they fear they might lose? Can you reduce their debt burden? Can you help them build out their market share? Can you help them reach more people and sell more via social media?

These are the kinds of questions you need to answer before you start jumping up and down about Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Otherwise you’re just propagating counter-productivity. Everybody knows that Facebook and Twitter are major time suckers unless you’re positioned to help someone every day. You have to actively help people get what they want out of life – whether that’s more sales, more compelling advertising, better health, a happier family life, a loving relationship, a place to live, a job.. whatever it is that’s motivating them.

Make the connection between what you offer and what people need, and you’ll be using social media and social networking tools effectively.

If you’d like to explore these topics in more detail and create a marketing campaign that gets immediate results, please give me a call at 949-515-3510 or email me at dunn@qualitywriter.com.

P.S. I can help you start figuring out what your prospects are looking for in just a few simple steps (using Facebook and Google AdWords, btw).

I just read an interesting article on persuasion specialist Robert Cialdini’s Influence Report site. The studies he’s following indicate that “timid” swear words peppered throughout sales and marketing presentations capture the attention of the audience. If the words are left out (as indicated in group studies) the messages have less impact and memorability.

Here’s the article link again: What New Year Resolution Can REDUCE Your Persuasiveness? – Marketing and Sales Tips

Take a look and let me know what you think by leaving a comment.

The Washington Post ran an article this past Monday about a musician who showed up to play violin at the entrance to one of the D.C. Metro stops. The full article is here – Pearls Before Breakfast – and it’s absolutely stunning on several different levels. In a nutshell, most of the passers-by that morning ignored or were annoyed by the man playing some of history’s most complex masterpieces on a $3.5 million Stradivarius violin. The man was Joshua Bell, the Avery Fisher honoree as best classical musician in America. Only one woman recognized him.

The story is strangely stirring and moving while disappointing. Something about it pulls at the heart strings, urging us, showing us that greatness is out there to be found and to be found within us. Anyone who has ever pursued artistic and/or musical endeavors can feel it.

Anyway, read the article if you’re in for a moving (if disturbing) experience.

Now – on to the marketing angle. There’s a point in the article that describes people playing Lotto while the virtuoso flails away on his Stradivarius. One man can even recite the exact amounts of the tickets he played and the money he lost. Pathetic.

If you’re involved in marketing, however, you recognize this particular scenario as pedestrian. People are commonly motivated by what’s in it for them. They are hard-pressed to part with quarters, even though Bell commands ticket prices of $150 and up, when a personal return is not blatantly obvious (you have to give some people a break – many are not classical enthusiasts). They are highly motivated to improve their lot in life, however, even though the lottery is not the best way to do it. They are motivated to go to work (as you’ll see most doing in the videos embedded in the article) to perform their missions and realize their dreams and deliver on their purpose. These areas are where marketing power lies. Personal agendas are a huge deal. People almost always look out for #1 first (even though it may be sad at times).

If you held a contest where Joshua Bell plays more popular tunes and the audience guesses their names a la “Name That Tune” you’d have a recipe for something different, I suppose. You’d need a cheesy MC like Richard Dawson, too. In that scenario, there’s something directly participatory and rewarding involved with the audience.

Another point to take away is that even genius needs window dressing – or “framing” as the article describes it in relation to paintings. Greatness needs to be introduced, and the audience needs to be instructed as to the level of competence they are encountering. Comparisons, testimonials, and, yes, even hyperbole are necessary to introduce kings, queens and accomplished musicians.

Marketing 101, perhaps, but very interesting to contemplate this with respect to the Bell/Post experience in the subway.

My clients have been asking for white paper writing quite frequently over the past few years. I don’t know if that’s a general trend, a function of my expertise and focus, or some perfect storm related to my Google page rank and key words (aside: I need to do some testing/SEO autopsy). In any event, I’m seeing a trend. In many cases white papers have become the new brochure. I think it’s a welcome development, and I’ll tell you why.

The modern white paper – technical or otherwise – has attributes of many different types of collateral pieces. On one level, it’s a education piece. On another, it’s a brochure of sorts. And, white papers often resemble case studies, with clear development from problem/challenge/issues to solution/presentation. All these attributes are welcome, IMHO.

Education is always great. People need information presented clearly in order to make good decisions. The case study angle in particular is very interesting. First, it forces the writer and the client/company to view their solution from the eyes of the user/customer. White paper format makes the writer think about the issues and hurdles close to the user first and then transition into the solution. Oftentimes, market forces and technology trends are used in white papers, as well. Same benefit – it forces the writer to view the problem on a larger scale. Only when macro, micro and user viewpoints are considered can a true solution be presented. White papers allow you to do this.

An old-fashioned brochure, on the other hand, is the antithesis of a white paper. I should clarify that… a typical, average, traditional brochure that presents the company and it’s products is the antithesis. These old-style brochures usually “led with their chin”.. meaning they presented a “hey look at us and our product” position before ever considering the needs and challenges of the customer/user. This kind of leave-behind, corporate overview brochure is a dying breed.

A friend of mine just had one of these old-style positioning brochures produced for his company, even though I advised against it. It was a waste of time, a waste of resources and a waste of a graphic designer for layout. It started with “this is who we are” (as if anyone cares).. then “this is what we do” (even though no need or urgency was developed first).. then “we’ve been in business for XX years” (another ‘who cares’ unless it can be linked to specific customer successes).. then the brochure offered no call to action, no “what to do next” and no lead-gen potential whatsoever. It was a money hole.

The friend thought he needed it to provide “legitimacy” as a leave behind, even though he admitted that it’s the kind of piece that gets glanced at and tossed. He thought it might help his image and brand. Urk. Branding without promotion, offers and call to action is for Coca Cola or Pfizer.. it’s not for small businesses with no national advertising budget. Heck even Coke and Pfizer have offers and promotions these days. It’s rare that even the big guys shout out an egotistical “hey look ut at us.”

So.. to answer my title question, yes I think the white paper is a new form of brochure. Web sites generally function as the company brochure nowadays, however the white paper acts as an extension of the web site. It gets people to act and engage, like the leave-behind brochure used to. In the old scenario, the salesman came to the office and offered the pitch then left the brochure behind as a reminder/in-depth business card.

In the new web scene, the site is the cold call, the white paper is the voluntary demo, and the email capture is the relationship builder/reminder. You can mix up the order, but I think these are the key phases. For example, you can offer a white paper after you’ve captured an email or phone number. Or, you can produce a white paper that’s so strong it gets high rankings on Google and generates its own leads via a call to action on the final page. In any event, the white paper is the key value proposition builder and demo. It’s got lots of flexibility, too. You can go deep into challenges and issues while doing a really soft sell on your presentation (or even a no sell). On the other hand, you can go really deep into solution discussions and product features on the back-end of the white paper if it’s appropriate. There are lots of ways to slice and dice it.

What are your thoughts? Is the white paper the new brochure? Is it the new pre-sales-call? Can you close business with white papers? Please comment – your views are appreciated.